Thread:Killingintents/@comment-29664475-20190928073351/@comment-43860862-20190928212716

your response is laughable.

> so this interview with miura where usumgallu is repeatedly described as genderless is completely irrelevant according to you

> the reason i corrected the "male and female" part is because the wording is exclusionary of people who don't align themselves with male or female identities. his intention was to state that gender meant nothing to usumgallu wrt romance specifically. when you write public articles, you have to inclusive of people outside of your circle. if that makes you uncomfortable, you're dedicating time and energy into the wrong activity.

> [http://www.isna.org/node/16 here is a link from the intersex society of north america explaining why the term you are so bent over backwards on defending is offensive to real people who are actually intersex. you wouldn't call a lesbian a d*ke. you wouldn't call a gay man a f*g. so don't call an intersex person a h*rmaphrodite].

> being intersex doesn't inherently make you lgbt anyway. there are cisgendered heterosexual intersex people so you trying to claim or defend that having a biological medical condition makes you lgbt+ is ignorant, outdated and holds no ground. neither androgyne or the hill you're trying to die on are even genders in the first place, so again, your failed attempt at a defense is pathetic and falls short. it's like trying to list gender dysphoria as a gender in place of "trans x" or trans y". the only reason i'll allow androgyne is because it's not a slur. once again, this is a public page. people of all races, religions, gender, etc - should have the right to access these pages without having to see characters they like referred to as slurs that are used to humiliate and dehumanize them.

> the only person who is having a temper tantrum is you. you couldn't even tolerate my message on your wall. if you attempt to ban me for keeping you from using misinformed, needless and offensive language on public pages which are meant for unbiased and accessible information, i will report you to wikia staff for your intolerant and hateful behavior.

> and i honestly have to laugh at you trying to imply that me making the article more accessible and inoffensive for others is "falsifying information to fit my world view". i could say the same about you.

have a great day. i'll be sure to keep an eye on the wikia since you've proven a vast amount of immaturity and incompetency in the face of a problem that never had to become one in the first place.